Technology has allowed us to
do things in a more convenient way. You can basically send a message to anyone
from different parts of the world and they would receive it in real time. Information
is just within the reach of your fingertips. Furthermore, thanks to technology, storing information has
never been easier. However, advances in technology can also bring harm to one
entity, and that is what the Decision Point in Chapter 7 entitled Technology
Dilemma painted in the scenario they gave.
In the scenario, an employee
was tasked to spy on a colleague because the data that will be collected will
be of possible use in court. In my opinion, a corporation has the right to “spy”
on its employees provided they mention it on their contract. However, I believe
that this should solely be done to monitor employee productivity and actions. I
do not support using spying programs to obtain information that is non-work
related though.
In my opinion, if they
wanted to get information, they should get an actual licensed investigator
instead of letting another employee do the job. Imagine if that employee got
caught, the image of the company will be ruined and the employee tasked to spy
might be isolated by his colleagues.
Employee monitoring is being
implemented for a long time already but the employees and employers must know the difference between monitoring and spying. Employees can not solely blame the
employers when they obtain information they hold private because it is also
their job to know what they have agreed on when they took the job. I think that
is the most important lesson of all: Know what you’re getting into before you
agree on doing anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment